CCTV footage from February 10, 2026, identifies Shivam Mishra, son of tobacco tycoon K.K. Mishra, as the driver in the Kanpur Lamborghini crash, debunking "hired driver" claims.
Brajesh Mishra
Elite impunity in Kanpur hit a digital dead-end today. For 48 hours, the narrative surrounding the horrific Lamborghini crash on VIP Road was a familiar script: an "unknown driver" and a sudden "medical seizure." However, as reported by The Times of India and PTI, new CCTV evidence has surfaced showing private security guards pulling Shivam Mishra—scion of the Banshidhar Tobacco empire—directly from the driver’s seat.
This matters because the footage has forced the Kanpur Police to officially name Mishra in the FIR; it halts a sophisticated legal attempt to pin the blame on a domestic staffer, ensuring that the investigation focuses on the person actually behind the wheel of the ₹10 crore machine.
While the mainstream media draws parallels to the "Pune Porsche Case," the real BIGSTORY is the Asset Seizure Conundrum. This Lamborghini Revuelto was part of the fleet scrutinized during the massive 2024 Income Tax raids on K.K. Mishra, where ₹4.5 crore in cash and several luxury cars with matching "4018" plates were found.
The question isn't just "who was driving," but how a vehicle associated with a reported ₹100 crore turnover discrepancy was being operated on public roads. If this car was technically under the scanner or attached during the IT proceedings, Shivam Mishra isn't just facing charges for reckless driving—he is potentially in violation of federal asset custody protocols.
The strongest argument for the defense remains the Medical Emergency claim. If medical records can prove a history of epilepsy or a sudden neurological event, the law distinguishes between "Involuntary Acts" and "Criminal Negligence." Proponents of this view argue that if the driver was truly incapacitated by a seizure, he lacked the mens rea (guilty mind) required for a criminal conviction, making it a tragic medical accident rather than a crime of arrogance.
Should a history of seizures permanently disqualify a person from owning or operating high-performance supercars, or is that an unfair restriction on personal liberty? Share your take in the comments.
Sources: The Economic Times, PTI, India Today
Sign up for the Daily newsletter to get your biggest stories, handpicked for you each day.
Trending Now! in last 24hrs